Supplemental Objection to Trustee's Final Application for Compensation

BOBBY N. HARMON, CPCU, ARM

xxxxx

Debtor, Pro SE

Websites:

www.kycbs.net

www.voy.com/129276/

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII

In re Case No. 99-04339

(Chapter 7)

BOBBY NORRIS HARMON dba

ORBITS HAWAII, Debtor

DEBTOR’S SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTION TO TRUSTEE’S FINAL APPLICATION FOR COMPENSATION AND TRUSTEE’S FINAL REPORT

DATE: March 19, 2008

TIME: 9:30 a.m.

JUDGE: Honorable Robert J. Faris

DEBTOR BOBBY HARMON’S SUPPLEMENTAL OBJECTION TO TRUSTEE’S FINAL APPLICATION FOR COMPENSATION AND TRUSTEE’S FINAL REPORT

Due to information newly discovered in the TRUSTEE’S FINAL REPORT filed on February 8, 2008, Debtor BOBBY N. HARMON repeats his previous arguments and submits this written Supplemental Objection to Trustee’s Final Application for Compensation and Trustee’s Final Report:

ARGUMENTS

1. To the best of Debtor’s knowledge and belief, he did not receive a copy of the TRUSTEE’S FINAL REPORT by mail. It was only through a PACER Query made by Debtor on March 17, 2008, that he obtained a copy for review. Debtor believes that the Trustee may have deliberately withheld this important information in another effort to defraud Debtor and the Creditors of the Estate.

2. Based upon his review of the TRUSTEE’S FINAL REPORT (see http://www.kycbs.net/BK-Final-Report-2-8-8.pdf ), Debtor makes the following comments and requests for undisclosed documents:

A. The REVIEW BY UNITED STATES TRUSTEE (page 2) is not dated or signed. Debtor hereby requests a dated and signed copy.

B. On Form 2, Cash Receipts And Disbursements Record (page 7), there is a Transaction dated 12/13/07, showing Paid To / Received From “Joann V. Mucha Successor Trustee M.L. Woo”. Debtor was never informed that Joann V. Mucha had ever been appointed and approved as a Successor Trustee, and if he had be so-informed, Debtor would have objected to this Appointment since Joanne V. Mucha is one of our potential witnesses in the Trustee’s lawsuit CV05-00030 (see http://www.CV05-00030-Witness-Mucha-Joanne.htm ).

C. On Form 2 (page 12), there are Transactions dated 09/21/00 and 12/06/00, showing payments to INTERNATIONAL SURETIES, LTD. for “BOND PREMIUM PAYMENTS ON LEDGER...FOR CASE #99-04339". The names of the Trustees’ bonding and professional liability insurance carriers have repeatedly been requested from the Trustee, but those requests have been ignored and refused. Since this payment now appears on the TRUSTEE’S FINAL REPORT, Debtor hereby requests complete copies of ALL bonds and insurance policies received by the Trustee as paid for from Estate funds, including but not limited to, those paid to International Sureties, Ltd.

D. On the CLAIMS REGISTER (page 28), Claim Number 10, Claimant BANK OF AMERICA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BANK, Claim Type “Secured”, Date Filed 11/29/99, there is a Note stating, “REFERENCE LETTER FROM DOUG CONSTANTINE, DATED 6/6/00. SECURED BY MORTGAGE AND BUSINESS ASSETS; AMENDED TO UNSECURED UNDER CLAIM NO 30 FILED 7/11/00.” Debtor has never received a copy of Doug Constantine’s letter dated 6/6/00, and hereby Motions the Court to Order that Trustee David C. Farmer provide him with a true copy of this letter for review before allowing this case to proceed.

E. On the CLAIMS REGISTER (page 31), Claim Number 30, Claimant BANK OF AMERICA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BANK, Claim Type “Unsecured”, Date Filed 11/24/99, there is a Note stating, ‘AMENDS CLAIMS NO. 10 FILED 11-16-99.” As Debtor never received a copy of Doug Constantine’s letter dated 6/6/00, or received any advice from his then-attorneys, Bradley Tamm and Greg Dunn, he was unaware that this change from a “Secured Claim” to an “Unsecured Claim” was made, or for what reason. However, it would appear to Debtor that this change – which was made BEFORE our home was foreclosed upon – would have PREVENTED that foreclosure. A possible explanation for this change would be that Doug Constantine was attempting at the time to SAVE our home from foreclosure, as he had contacted us by phone around this time saying that the bank wanted to “work something out” in order to prevent foreclosure. However, we were told by our attorneys, Dunn and Tamm, at the time that only the Trustee could talk with the bank, and other, creditors. Therefore, if this explanation is true, then the foreclosure on our home was clearly the result of fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud.

F. Since the civil case, CV05-00030 - David C. Farmer vs. Harmon has not be completely resolved, and since there are outstanding claims of fraud, racketeering, mismanagement, errors and omissions, etc., against Mary Lou Woo, James B. Nicholson, David C. Farmer, Steven Guttman, Kessner Duca Umebayashi Bain & Matsunaga, and others, Debtor believes that this Trustee’s Final Report is premature.

CONCLUSION

DUE TO THE ABOVE FACTS AND ARGUMENTS, Debtor again asks that this Honorable Court DISALLOW THE TRUSTEE’S FINAL REPORT AND APPLICATION(S) FOR COMPENSATION.

Further, Respondent again asks the Court to thoroughly examine the original, complete Settlement Agreement, with particular attention to the parties signing the Agreement and the dates signed, and any undisclosed “side agreements” made after the Agreement was filed and approved by the Court, and render a Decision on whether this was a valid, enforceable contract, signed by all parties in interest at the time of its filing and Approval by this Court. Respondent also asks the Court to verify that there were no undisclosed “side agreements” entered into between any parties in this case AFTER the Settlement Agreement was filed with the Court for approval.

Further, Debtor asks the Court to require all purported attorneys for KAMEHAMEHA SCHOOLS and its former, interim and current trustees, and for P&C INSURANCE COMPANY, to present written evidence that they were, in fact, authorized to represent these entities, and that they had the written authority from their insurance carriers to negotiate and settle the underlying claims in this case.

Further, Debtor asks the Court to rule in his favor that his First Amendment Rights have been violated under Arbitrator Judith Neustadter Fuqua’s broad and vague definition of “Protected Subject Matter”.

Further, Debtor asks the Court to rule in his favor that Mary Lou Woo, James Nicholson, David Farmer, Steven Guttman and Kessner Duca Umebayashi Bain & Matsunaga, and Sterling & Tucker all have undisclosed conflicts of interests.

Further, Debtor moves the Court to withhold approval of any and all Awards made by the Arbitrator, and the authorization of any further payments from Estate funds to Mary Lou Woo, James Nicholson, David Farmer, Steven Guttman, Kessner Duca Umebayashi Bain & Matsunaga, and Sterling & Tucker until all remaining disputes have been resolved, including Respondent’s unanswered Fraud, Tax Evasion, Racketeering, Errors & Omissions, Bad Faith, and other ongoing claims against parties in interest. (See www.kycbs.net/Whistler )

DATED AT SPRINGFIELD, KENTUCKY: March 17, 2008

_____________________________

BOBBY NORRIS HARMON,

Debtor Pro Se

Internet References: