THE GREATEST GREED
ON EARTH
Profiting from “Playing God”
Sightings from The Catbird Seat
~ o ~
December 17, 2006
The Drudge Report has had headlines about this scandal several times lately:
Rich Israelis Seeking ‘Rejuvenation’
Linked To Horrifically Murdered
Ukrainian Babies
By: Sorcha Faal, What Does It Mean?
In a World gone completely insane, there are very few reports we research that truly shock us on all levels as human beings, today one such report has shaken us all due to its sheer horrific brutality, the murdering and butchery of new-born babies for their stem cells and internal organs so that rich Westerners are able to have what are called ‘Rejuvenation’ treatments.
From today’s FSB reports there is apparent confirmation supporting the allegations made by one of Ukraine’s top prosecutors, Irina Bogomolova, who was dismissed from her investigation involving the murdering of newborn babies for their stem cells and organs, and as also confirmed by Western media sources, and as we can read as reported by Britain’s Telegraph News Service in their article titled “Stem cell baby deaths probe 'too close to the truth', claims investigator", and which says:
"A Ukrainian investigator looking into claims that new-born babies were killed to harvest their stem cells and internal organs says she was removed from the case after demanding that the inquiry be extended to all Ukraine's maternity hospitals. Irina Bogomolova, who works in the chief prosecutor's office in the capital, Kiev, claims she was taken off the case because she came too close to the truth while investigating allegations made by women who claim their babies were taken away from them immediately after birth.
She said: "I was sacked for political reasons. I demanded an investigation into all maternity wings in hospitals across Ukraine and I was relieved of duty after making that demand. "A trade in stem cells exists here... I suspect there is a lot of bribery going on, right up to highest levels." Pregnant women, especially from rural areas, are very vulnerable targets as they will obviously believe whatever the doctors tell them. It's easy to take their babies from them and tell them they died or were born dead due to complications."
The Council of Europe is to investigate allegations that newborn babies, and foetuses, have been killed to provide stem cells and internal organs for controversial medical and cosmetic treatments. Officials of the Strasbourg-based human rights organisation are to travel to Ukraine in February to investigate the role played by some of the country's research centres and maternity hospitals in the international trade."
Even more disturbing about these reports are the ‘links’ provided between numerous Ukrainian Maternity Hospitals and Israel’s pharmaceutical giant Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.*, who are alleged to be the purchasers of these murdered babies stem cells, and organs, through its alliance with Jerusalem-based Gamida Cell.
The Gamida Cell Company’s research is described as:
To the actual process of older humans being able to be rejuvenated by the stem cells of babies we can read:
There have been many experiments which have been shown to increase the maximum life span of laboratory animals, thereby achieving life extension. A few experimental methods such as replacing hormones to youthful levels have had considerable success in partially rejuvenating laboratory animals and humans. There are at least eight important hormones that decline with age: 1. human growth hormone (HGH); 2. the sexual hormones: testosterone or estrogen/progesterone; 3. erithropoietin EPO; 4. insulin; 5. DHEA; 6. melatonin; 7. thyroid; 8. pregnenolone. In theory, if all or some of these hormones are replaced, the body will respond to them as it did when it was younger, thus repairing and restoring many body functions. This seems to be borne out in hundreds of thousands of persons who have replaced hormones for many years, especially human growth hormone (HGH, a.k.a. GH).
Most attempts at genetic repair have traditionally involved the use of a retrovirus to insert a new gene into a random position on a chromosome. But by attaching zinc fingers (which determine where transcription factors bind) to endonucleases (which break DNA strands) homologous recombination can be induced to correct and replace defective (or undesired) DNA sequences. The first applications of this technology are to isolate stem cells from the bone marrow of patients having blood disease mutations, to correct those mutations in laboratory dishes using zinc finger endonucleases and to transplant the stem cells back into the patients.
Regenerative medicine uses three different strategies:
Implantation of stem cells from culture into an existing tissue structure
Implantation of stem cells into a tissue scaffold that guides restoration or
Induction of residual cells of a tissue structure to regenerate the necessary body part."
To the moral implications of the World’s rich being able to extend their lives via the murdering of new-born babies there are no historical counterparts, but does serve as yet another horrific example of how degenerate of Mind and Soul the Western peoples have truly become.
It should also be noted that these FSB reports linking the Israelis, and the Western peoples, to these Ukrainian baby murders could also be a part of the ongoing, and increasing, propaganda war currently underway between Russia and the Western Powers over Russia’s refusal to accept new United Nations laws over the Serbian breakaway region of Kosovo, and which the United States is preparing to us on its own territory for the establishment of their North American Union comprising the Nations of the United States, Mexico and Canada.
© December 17, 2006 EU and US all rights reserved.
(Thanks to V.K. Durham at The Antechamber for this article)
*And who owns Teva Pharmaceutical Industries ?
and...what is their connection with our new Secretary of Defense,
Robert Gates?
March 23, 2003
PARENTS SEEK NEW INQUIRY INTO HARVESTING OF INFANTS’ ORGANS
By Lizette Alvarez, New York Times
DUBLIN, Ireland - When Flonnuala O’Reilly’s baby boy, Michael, who was born with severe birth defects, died at 5 months during exploratory surgery, she asked to be allowed to dress him in his yellow baby outfit.
O’Reilly gave the infant a final hug, then buried him in a white coffin no bigger than a Moses basket.
Five years later, when news organizations reported that hospitals in Dublin had been removing children’s organs during autopsies and storing them for research without the parents’s knowledge, O’Reilly drummed up the courage to call Our Lady’s Hospital for Sick Children in Crumlin, the country’s largest pediatric hospital. In a meeting with hospital officials, she was told that her son’s heart and lungs had, in fact, been “retained.”
“I was being told that my son’s organs are being kept in a bucket of formaldehyde down there,” O’Reilly said.
“My child’s life relegated to a few spare body parts. My beautiful child.”
Since that meeting in 1999, O’Reilly, like hundreds of other parents in Ireland who discovered that their children’s organs had been removed without their knowledge, has sought answers to many questions.
Some were quickly answered: The hospital said it had not asked O’Reilly’s permission to remove the organs because it did not want to further upset her after she had just lost a child. Apologies were made, and the practice stopped. But questions about why the organs were removed and whether anyone profited from the practice await the completion of an independent government inquiry started in 2001.
Now, O’Reilly and other parents, distressed at the slow pace and ineffectiveness at the slow pace and ineffectiveness of that investigation, are demanding a new one, which they say must have subpoena power to compel the hospitals to explain their actions.
At least 50 families, facing a three-year statute of limitations, have also gone to court to retain their right to sue.
Charlotte Yeates, 50, was the first mother to telephone a hospital and ask about her daughter’s organs after she saw a documentary on television about a similar scandal in Bristol, England. After she took her story to the media, others, like O’Reilly, also started making inquiries.
Yeates, O’Reilly and others formed an organization called Parents for Justice, which now includes 800 families, and lobbied hard for information.
The parents found that the removal and use of organs for research dated at least to 1970, and was routine and legal, in about 200 hospitals and other health care facilities. A few hospitals had for small amounts of money sent pituitary glands to pharmaceutical companies that were researching dwarfism.
Some hospitals said that pathologists stored the organs in the hope of preventing similar deaths. They said they did not think there was anything wrong with the practice. It had never been questioned.
“The extent of the organ retention was a shock even to people in the profession,” said Dr. Declan Keane, the head of the National Maternity Hospital in Dublin, which was among the first to return stored organs to parents.
When the government opened its inquiry, it promised a report in six months. Hospital cooperation was voluntary out of concerns about patient confidentiality. Once a report was issued, the Irish Parliament would decide whether to do its own investigation.
But the investigation has lagged. Paul Cantwell, the assistant principal for the Department of Health and Children, is expected to finish the section on pediatric hospitals by the end of the year.
Soon after news broke, the government ordered hospitals to return stored organs and change their policies, and they did. Families began arriving to pick up their children’s organs or to learn that the organs had been burned.
Now families whose children must undergo a post-mortem examination are explicitly asked their permission to remove and store organs for research.
From And the Truth Shall Set You Free, by David Icke:
MASTER RACES
Ask most people about the master race mentality and they will point to Adolf Hitler and the Nazis. But again, it is not as simple as that.
The plan for a master race and the elimination of ‘lesser’ races did not begin and end in Nazi Germany. It began long before and it is still going on....
This master race mentality is another part of the Elite’s plan for the New World Order. . . . The Nazis were doing and saying publicly what the Elite in Britain and America had been saying and funding long before the word Nazi was even heard of.
EUGENICS is, to quote the Oxford Concise Dictionary, “... the production of fine offspring by the improvement of inherited qualities.”
The term eugenics was coined by the Englishman, Francis Galton, in the later years of the 19th century. He called for society to intervene to maintain racial purity.
Galton wanted the forced sterilisation of the ‘unfit’.
Another ‘pioneer’ of this mindset was Thomas Robert Malthus, born in 1766. It was from him that the theory of the ‘survival of the fittest’ was passed on through Herbert Spencer to Charles Darwin.
Malthus was obsessed with the culling of the population and proposed a series of measures against the ‘lower races’ (the poor), to keep the population down and , as he saw it, to prevent the human genetic stream being dominated by such ‘inferior’ racial lines.
In his best known work, Essay, he suggested that streets should be made narrower and more people crowded into houses, to encourage the return of the plague. Villages should be built next to stagnant pools and, above all, remedies for preventing and curing disease ought to be strongly condemned, he said.
Malthus went on: “We are bound in justice and honour formally to disclaim the right of the poor to support. To this end, I should propose a regulation be made declaring that no child born ... should ever be entitled to parish assistance.... The [illegitimate] infant is comparatively speaking, of little value to society, as others will immediately supply its place.... All children beyond what would be required to keep up the population to this [desired] level, must necessarily perish, unless room be made for them by the deaths of grown persons.”
From such a mind did the idea of the ‘survival of the fittest’ emerge, and it has dominated ‘science’ ever since! Add to this the belief that the intellect of a person is genetically determined by the intellect of the parents and you have the eugenics movement, which came to the surface so infamously under the rule of Adolf Hitler....
Names ... such as the Harrimans and the Rockefellers, were seriously into eugenics. Averell Harriman’s mother funded the launch of the race-science movement in America in 1910, and built the Eugenics Record Office as a branch of the Galton National Laboratory in London. The Harrimans were responsible for the Bush family fortune and they were close to another Bush family backer, George Herbert Walker (a relative by marriage of Prescott Bush and grandfather to George Bush, who would go on to be President of the United States).
By the late 19th century, some mentally ill people and children were being sterilised by US health officials as a result of eugenics policies. The State of Indiana made the sterilisation of the mentally ill and ‘undesirables’ compulsory and 475 men were sterilised at the Indiana State Reformatory.
After the turn of the century, the Harrimans and Rockefellers spent more than $11 million to establish a eugenics research laboratory at Cold Springs Harbor on Long Island, New York, close to the Dulles brothers’ estates. The study of eugenics was encouraged at the Elite-controlled universities, such as Harvard, Columbia, and Cornell.
In Germany, the same line was taken by Ernst Haeckel, the mystic and Aryan master race promoter, whose ideas would influence Hitler. Haeckel said it was the duty of a nation to enforce breeding, and he and his supporters formed the Monist League to promote their sick beliefs in Germany.
The first International Congress of Eugenics was held in London in 1912. Among its directors were Winston Churchill and Alexander Graham Bell, inventor of the telephone. By 1917, fifteen US States had eugenics laws, and all but a few of them made legal the compulsory sterilisation of epileptics, the mentally ill and retarded, and regular criminals.
In 1932, a year before Hitler and Roosevelt came to power, the Harrimans helped to organise the Third International Congress on Eugenics at the American Museum of Natural History in New York. . . . These wealthy American families, like their counterparts in Britain, feel themselves to be racially superior and they wish to protect their racial purity. This— along with the pursuit of power, wealth, and influence— is the reason why so many intermarriages take place within these families....
The aim of the eugenics movement was, and is, to create a Master Race by the sterilisation and forced birth control of those races considered ‘inferior’.
The International Congress of Eugenics in New York in 1932 tackled the ‘problem’ (as they saw it) of African-Americans and other ‘inferior’ stock reproducing and expanding their numbers. It was decided that the way to deal with this ‘danger’ to the higher races (themselves) was through sterilisation and ‘cutting off the bad stock’.
The Congress was dedicated to the work of Averell Harriman’s mother and Averell did his best to support the proceedings. He personally arranged for the Hamburg-Amerika Shipping Line (controlled by himself, George Walker and Prescott Bush) to transport Nazis from Germany to New York so they could take part in the Congress. The best known of them was Dr. Ernst Rudin, a psychiatrist at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Genealogy and Demography in Berlin. There he occupied an entire floor with his eugenics ‘research’, and all of this was made possible by funds provided by ... the Rockefellers.
Dr. Rudin was unanimously elected president of the International Federation of Eugenics Societies at the New York Congress, and this was, in part, a recognition of his work as a founder of the German Society for Race Hygiene.
The eugenics movement called for the sterilisation of mental patients (mental hygiene societies); the execution of criminals, the insane, and the terminally ill (euthanasia societies); and race purification by sterilization and the prevention of births to those considered inferior bloodstocks (population control societies). All of this was up and running long before anyone had heard of Adolf Hitler and the Nazis. Hitler’s Germany was a vehicle for part of this movement; it wasn’t the whole movement.
Soon after Hitler had abolished elections and became dictator of Germany in 1933, the Rockefeller-funded Dr. Rudin was commissioned to write the “Law for the Prevention of Hereditary Diseases in Posterity”, which involved the forced sterilisation of anyone considered genetically inferior. A quarter of a million people who were mental patients, blind, deaf, or alcoholics were sterilised on the order of special eugenics courts....
But where did the Nazi Rudin get his inspiration from for the wording of his race laws?
From the Model Eugenical Sterilization Law of 1922, presented by H.H. Laughlin, the eugenics ‘expert’ of the US House of Representatives Committee on Immigration and Nationalisation, which was accepted by many States.
Eugenics was not unique to Nazi Germany. In 1942, the American ‘psychiatrist’ Foster Kennedy called for the killing of retarded children, and between 1941 and ‘43 more than 42,000 people were sterilised in America.
Nor did the master race mentality end in 1945 with the demise of Hitler’s Germany. Obviously, talk of master races, racial purity, and sterilisation to improve the stock was bad PR, once some of the tales of Nazi projects began to be known. But all that happened was that the names for master race policies were changed to disguise the true meaning.
We began to hear about euthanasia and population control instead of eugenics and race purification, but it’s all the same thing really. What the Harrimans, Rockefellers, and people like Prescott Bush were funding and supporting before and during the war, their successors have continued to promote under the cover of ‘acceptable’ language.
For instance, one of the people who worked with the Harrimans and Prescott Bush in their funding of Hitler was William H. Draper Jr., the man who helped to fund the Nazi cartels and was then appointed by Roosevelt after the war to decide what should be done with them.
Draper, a close associate of Averell Harriman, was a major funder of the International Eugenics Congress before the war and was one of those responsible for making Dr. Ernst Rudin, the head of the world eugenics movement. In 1958, Draper was appointed to chair a committee which was advising President Dwight Eisenhower on the use of military aid to other countries.
This appointment was made possible by Prescott Bush, who was then a US Senator for Connecticut. Bush was a regular golf partner of the president and of National Security Advisor Gordon Gray (a close friend and eugenics promoter).
By now, John Foster Dulles (Bush’s former lawyer during the funding of Hitler) was the Secretary of State, and his brother, Allen Dulles (formerly with Schroder, Hitler’s personal bankers) was head of the CIA.
To put it mildly, a eugenics enthusiast like Draper had many people around him of like mind. This allowed him to change the whole thrust of his committee from that of advising on military aid to campaigning on the threat of the ‘population explosion’. His committee formulated plans to depopulate the poorer countries: i.e. those people who do not have white skins. The growth of such peoples, said Draper, was a threat to the national security of the United States.
Eisenhower dismissed Draper’s proposals, but with support from his fellow racial purity fanatics, he went on to found the Population Crisis Committee/’Draper Fund’, which— together with the Rockefeller and DuPont families— continued to promote eugenics under the guise of population control.
Draper was advisor to President Lyndon Johnson on this subject and that administration began to use the overseas aid programme to fund birth control in non-white countries.
Another of Draper’s like-minds in American politics was to be Prescott’s son, George Bush, a vocal supporter of General Draper’s policies. Bush arranged hearings as early as 1969 into the dangers posed by the birth of too many black babies.
Draper’s son and heir, William H. Draper III, was co-chairman for finance and head of fundraising for the George Bush For President campaign in 1980.
Later in that decade, Bush persuaded Ronald Reagan to appoint the younger Draper to be administrator of the United Nations Development Programme, an organisation connected with the World Bank and charged with supervising population control!
Eugenics and master race policies were passed on across the generations of these ruling families of the Elite. During George Bush’s tenure in the White House, the population control element of the aid budget soared. His legal counsel from 1980 was Boyden Gray, who became the chief legal advisor to the President during the Bush administration.
Gray would have been able to give him plenty of advice on population control. When Boyden was a boy after the war, his father, Gordon Gray (Prescott Bush’s close friend), launched the project which provided the basis of today’s global sterilisation programme.
In 1946, the eugenics movement was trying to rebuild itself in the wake of the rather unfortunate publicity aroused by on of its chief advocates, Adolf Hitler. During the war, The Sterilization League of America had changed its name to Birthright Inc., and was now looking for a means to get back to business.
Its efforts to relaunch itself in Iowa ended when a young boy died during a sterilisation operation and the bad publicity brought an end to the plan. Instead they moved to Gray family territory in North Carolina.
Gordon Gray had founded the Bownam Gray (Memorial) Medical School in Winston-Salem. It was named after Boyden’s grandfather, who had owned the R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company.
The school became a centre for eugenics. It compiled extensive records of families carrying ‘inherited diseases’, and it began a project which ... get this ... forcibly sterilised young children who were not considered to be of a high enough IQ.
No, no. I am not talking about Nazi Germany during the war; I am talking about the United States of America in 1946-1947!
Boyden Gray’s great aunt, Alice Shelton Gray, founded the Human Betterment League (the North Carolina branch of the national eugenics sterilisation movement), and she was the official supervisor of the master race experiment that was begun at the Grays’ ‘medical school’.
Others involved were Dr. Claude Nash Herndon, the assistant director of ‘medical genetics’ at the school, and Dr. Clarence Gamble (the heir to the Proctor and Gamble soap empire), who was the chief of ‘national field operations’.
Children enrolled in the Winston-Salem school district were given ‘intelligence tests’ and those who fell below the mark considered acceptable to these bizarre people were sterilised.
Their recommendations were passed to the State Eugenics Board, which had the authority to order sterilisation under North Carolina law. Dr. Claude Nash Herdon talked of his work in an interview in 1990 which was reported in George Bush, The Unauthorised Biography:
“...IQ tests were run on all the children in the Winston-Salem school system. Only the ones who scored really low [were targeted for sterilisation], the real bottom of the barrel, like below 70. Did we do sterilizations on young children? Yes. This was a relatively minor operation. ... It was usually not [done] until the child was eight or ten years old. For the boys, you just make an incision and tie the tube. ... We more often performed the operation on girls than with boys. Of course, you have to cut open the abdomen, but again, it is relatively minor.”
Oh, that’s OK then. What were the media doing while all this was going on? Not a lot, it turns out. Dr. Herndon talked of their “good relationship” with the press. This is less surprising when you realize that Gordon Gray owned the Winston-Salem Journal, the Twin City Sentinel and the radio station WSJS.
Eugenics was being promoted on a wide scale after the war in the guise of population control, just as it is today. In the early 50s, when John Foster Dulles was chairman of the tax-exempt New World Order front, the Rockefeller Foundation, he travelled with John D. Rockefeller III on a number of world tours campaigning for policies to stem the expansion of the non-white populations.
In November 1952, Dulles and Rockefeller launched the Population Council with tens of millions of dollars provided by the Rockefeller family. The American Eugenics Society left its old headquarters at Yale University, the home of the sinister Skull and Bones Society, and moved in with the Population Council. The two organisations, in effect, became one.
The first president of the Population Council was Frederick Osborne, the long-time secretary of the American Eugenics Society. The child-steriliser of North Carolina, Dr. Claude Nash Herndon, was made president of the Eugenics Society in 1953.
When George Bush became ambassador to the United Nations in 1972, he and his clique in the US Agency for International Development arranged the first official contract between the American government and the Sterilization League of America, which had, by then, changed its name yet again, to the Association for Voluntary Surgical Contraception.
Under this contract, the US government (taxpayers) began to fund this organisation to do in non-white countries of the world what it had already done to children in North Carolina.
In 1988, the year George Bush was elected president, another contract was arranged which involved the American taxpayer spending $80 million over five years to expand this work in 58 countries in Asia, Africa, and Spanish-America. Millions have been sterilised and most of it has been funded by the taxpayer.
Other countries do the same. And by the way, Dr. Clarence Gamble, the sterilising enthusiast from the Proctor and Gamble soap family and the Bowman Gray Medical School, as also enjoyed funding from the USAID budget.
His so-called Pathfinder Fund is paid to infiltrate non-white societies and break down resistance to sterilisation.
The Planned Parenthood Federation, which has been supported at every opportunity by George Bush and the manipulating Elite, was actually founded in London, at the offices of the British Eugenics Society....
Global centralisation of power, fundamental control of the minds and bodies of the mass population, and the creation of a master race.
These are the themes that span the centuries and they still dominate the secret agenda today, which is manipulating our lives....
From ericture1@aol.com
Nov 6, 200l
Activist says he has proof
U.S. created HIV
by Eric Ture Muhammad
WASHINGTON - For the past nine years Boyd Ed Graves has lived with HIV. Since the beginning of his research in 1992, he has become one of the world’s most recognized AIDS activists.
For the last two years, Mr. Graves has charged the U.S. government with the creation of this disease as a part of an overall plan to eliminate world populations, Blacks in particular.
He also asserts that the plan and its execution has cost U.S. taxpayers $550 million and that he has discovered evidence of an AIDS-virus flow chart produced by the government that he says proves his claim.
Until recently, these assertions beyond the scientific community have been at best alarming. Many critics sought to disprove them. However, the recently piqued interest of an Ohio congressman has breathed new life in the activist’s war on the disease.
Rep. James A. Traficant Jr. (D-Ohio) has expressed interest in Mr. Graves’ claims and is in the process of organizing a hearing on the Special Virus Cancer Program of the U.S. government that ran from 1962-1978. According to published reports, he has also asked the U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO) to provide an account of American tax dollars allegedly provided for the project.
Rep.Traficant, no stranger to theories of government conspiracy, was the lead congressional investigator into the ill-fated TWA flight 800 that, in 1996, crashed shortly after takeoff from Kennedy International Airport into the Atlantic Ocean.
"What we expect initially from Congressman Traficant is to have him on the floor of the House to unveil the flow chart," said Dr. Graves, who also is director of AIDS Concerns for the International Medical Research Foundation of the group Common Cause in Ontario, Canada.
"If you follow the money, we can get to the heart of this issue. The GAO sent a letter on Aug. 20, that indeed they had looked into the preliminary information that they had received from the congressman, the flowchart and the budget for this program and were calling for an additional investigation from the Health Care Team of the GAO," he said.
"The congressman has agreed to ask for an investigation by the GAO or the Congressional Committee on Investigations," said Anthony Traficanti, the congressman’s regional director.
"The information presented by Dr. Graves is very shocking and very revealing. Our government is supposed to be sensitive to the people’s concerns and the flowchart was very revealing to me," he said in a recent interview with The Buckeye Review.
The 1971 U.S. Special AIDS Virus Flow Chart was unveiled in October 1999 by Dr. Graves at the Western Reserve Historical Society in Cleveland, Ohio. It coordinates over 20,000 scientific papers and 15 years of progress reports of a secret, federal virus development program.
It contains within its five-section foldout, thousands of secret experiments detailing the creation and mass production of a human immunodefeciency virus. Independent experts agree that this program is the birthplace of HIV/AIDS and other mysterious illnesses, according to Mr. Graves.
In 1977, this virus program produced 15,000 gallons of AIDS, he said. According to the chart, the United States was represented by Dr. Robert Gallo and the USSR (Soviet Union) was represented by a Dr. Novakhatskiy of the Ivanosky Institute.
"This was the beginnings of the plot to thin the Black population," Mr. Graves said.
"The flow chart is the research logic flow of an ultra-secret federal program called ‘The Special Virus’.”
It is the designer product of a century long hunt for a contagious cancer that will selectively kill.
The necessity for the creation and deployment of AIDS is fully outlined in U.S. population control policy decisions including National Security Study Memorandum 200 (NSSM-200) of 1974, written and presented by Henry Kissinger at the mega-conference on population control held in Bucharest, Romania," Dr. Graves told The Final Call.
In January 2000, Mr. Graves filed a lawsuit against the president of the United States charging the government created the HIV virus.
In January 2001, that case was dismissed in federal court as "frivolous."
Last April, Dr. Graves, armed with 10,000 signatures, hand delivered to the Supreme Court an appeals brief on the matter. It is currently under review.
Comparing the discovery as a trip through the "Land of Oz," Dr. Graves said the chart provides irrefutable evidence that HIV/AIDS is a design of population control and it dispels the myths associated with the disease.
"I don’t know where you were when you saw for the first time the curtain pulled back in the film The Wizard of Oz, and discovered that things weren’t what they seemed. That discovery changes a person. How dare the U.S. government perpetrate that over 70 percent of the deaths from HIV/AIDS are found in the Black communities because we are more sexually scurrilous.
That is simply not true.
“The majority of the U.S. population is white. How then can Black women be the fastest growing group coming down with HIV/AIDS today when the largest sexual preferences (gay, bisexual and multi-partnered) are found among American whites?
“How does a so-called white, homosexual disease, transform itself into a
health problem for Black women?" he asked.
– The flow chart can be accessed through his website www.boydgraves.com
For more, GO TO > > > The Global Fund
October 28, 2000
GRANNY ARRESTED
FOR ORGAN SALES
The Associated Press
MOSCOW – The boy thought his grandmother was taking him to Disneyland, but Russian police say she had other plans: to sell her grandson so his organs could be used for transplants.
Police in Ryazan, 125 miles southeast of Moscow, said Saturday that they arrested a woman after they were tipped that she was trying to sell her grandson to a man who was going to take the boy to the West.
There his organs were to be removed and sold, a Ryazan police duty officer said....
The woman was helped in the scheme by the boy’s uncle, who told police the child was being sold for about $70,000.
When asked how he could sell his nephew, the uncle replied: “My mother said that it is none of my business, he is her grandson.”
The boy, whose age was not released, lived with his grandmother. Police said she told him he was being taken to Disneyland.
Body parts have been smuggled out of Russia in the past for sale in the West as organ replacements.
September 30, 2000
BRITISH DOCTOR SOUGHT AFTER
CHILD BODY PARTS FOUND
CCN.com
LONDON, England (CNN) – Police in the Canadian province of Nova Scotia have issued an arrest warrant for a British pathologist after children’s organs were discovered in a warehouse.
Police in the town of Halifax say the organs appear to be from one or two children and DNA tests are now being conducted to try to identify the remains.
The warrant for the arrest of Dr. Dick van Velzen has been issued across Canada for “improperly or indecently interfering or offering indignity to a dead human body or human remains,” police said.
The doctor has been linked to previous cases of the removal of organs and tissue from dead children at the Alder Hey hospital in Liverpool, England.
An inquiry is being held in Britain into more than 800 cases of organ removals, for which parents said they were not advised of, at the hospital.
Police in Halifax said they did not believe the organs were from local children and had been stored at the warehouse for at least two years....
~ ~ ~
UNFORTUNATELY...THERE’S EVEN MORE OF
THE GREATEST GREED ON EARTH!
\/
China - From Midweek, 11/8/00: China’s Brutal One-Child Policy. . . .
“BOYCOTT THE PHARMACEUTICAL BUTCHERS OF BEIJING!”
By Michelle Malkin
Is there a protester out there brave enough to wear that phrase on a T-shirt? Search high and low, but you will not find any ... activists criticizing communist China’s peddlers of RU-486, the abortion pill.
The Washington Post reported recently that the Hua Lian Pharmaceutical Co, a govt-owned firm outside of Shanghai, will manufacture Mifepristone— the raw compound for RU-486— for sale in the United States. The firm is one of three in China that makes the drug. It won U.S. approval to produce and export abortion drug ingredients here thanks to financial help from population control fanatics at the Rockefeller Foundation.
Pro-abortion groups are ecstatic. But while American women celebrate their newly-acquired “choice,” millions of pregnant women in China are forced to swallow the poison pill against their will. It is no small coincidence that RU-486 was originally developed by a drug company whose parent corporation manufactured Zyklon B — the poison gas used in Nazi concentration camps to destroy millions of unwanted lives.
Family-planning propagandists in China slyly echo the liberating rhetoric of their U.S. counterparts.
“RU-486 has given women more choices, and it’s been beneficial to women’s health,” Gao Ersheng, director of the Shanghai Institute of Planned Parenthood Research, told the Post. “Most unmarried women prefer Mifepristone, which is less painful and more private than surgical abortions,” Gao told The New York Times.
Preferences? Pain? Privacy?
Since when did Chinese family-planning bureaucrats care about any of those things? Certainly not since they instituted the one-child policy in 1979. An army of 200,000 officials and a million volunteers who comprise “street committees” snoop on the fertility of Chinese citizens. The government keeps dossiers tracking women’s menstrual cycles.
All women who “choose” to undergo surgical abortions “prefer” to do so without anesthesia.
Out of an estimated 10 million abortions performed in China each year, the Washington Post reports, about half of those that are performed in the cities use RU-486. The other five million women undergo such methods as saline injections to induce miscarriage; Ribalor injections, which cause congestive heart failure in the unborn baby, who is then delivered dead; or partial-birth abortions in which doctors inject formaldehyde into a baby’s soft spot as the child crowns during delivery.
“Neither abortion nor RU-486 is a subject for moral debate in China in the way it is in the United States,” the Post noted. There is no debate in China about anything. When a family disagrees with the government’s diagnosis, the consequences are hellish— ranging from back-breaking fines and forced sterilization to mass infanticide. . . .
If you think government-sponsored baby-killing no longer happens in 21st century China, you missed last month’s international headlines: “Chinese officials drown baby in front of parents.” Huang Quisheng, a rural farmer, told London reporters how family planners had tried to induce a miscarriage in his eight-months-pregnant wife by injecting saline solution into her womb.
Against the odds, their baby son survived and was born healthy.
But, as Huang recounted: “They grabbed him from me and threw him to the floor and kicked him several times. We were ordered to go home as they took him to the back of the government building and drowned him...”
The enforcers of this brutal regime will now reap profits by selling their deadly abortion pills to the United States. Feminists embrace them; the White House toasts them; a bipartisan Congress rewards them with a multibillion-dollar trade deal.
The laboratories of an evil empire churn and bellow as millions of Chinese parents mourn.
And where are America’s human rights activists?
Boycotting Happy Meals, sneakers and Kathie Lee....
Planned Parenthood Federation of America - “One of America’s greatest threats to the right to life”.
The Real Planned Parenthood Agenda
"Only an utterly ruthless, steely-nerved manipulator such as Sanger could have parlayed a daring, New-Age style immorality into a massive, multi-billion dollar enterprise so immensely powerful that in many countries (the U.S. included) it is...like a government within a government."
– Bernard Nathanson, MD, Pro-life former abortionist
~ ~ ~
They're big. They're strong. They're powerful. They have an influential presence in every state. They're widely respected and revered.
And they're one of America's greatest threats to the right to life.
The Planned Parenthood Federation of America, which operates on a current massive annual budget of more than $504 million (an increase of $27 million from the previous year) and has local affiliates all across Pennsylvania and state affiliates nationwide, has a record for ending the lives of unborn children that is unmatched by any other institution in the free world.
Founded by Margaret Sanger, who wrote in her book Women and the New Race, "The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it," Planned Parenthood continues to annually increase its involvement in doing abortions.
While the national abortion rate decreases, PPFA's piece of the pie grows ever larger. Planned Parenthood did 133,289 abortions at its centers in 1994, and 139,899 in 1995, and 153,367 in 1996.
Planned Parenthood referred women elsewhere for an additional 98,325 abortions in 1994 and 59,682 in 1995.
In 1996, they referred women who didn't want to parent their babies for adoption only 6,274 times, giving them a 22-to-1 ratio in favor of abortion over adoption for women who went to them for "help."
This emphasis on abortion as the solution to problem pregnancies is also shown in a report from the General Accounting Office which showed that pregnant women who go to Planned Parenthood for counseling abort seven times more often than women who go to other "family planning" agencies.
What's worse, annually as much as $171.9 million of Planned Parenthood's funding comes from your taxes in the form of government contracts and grants.
Their other funding comes from income from the clinics ($180.5 million annually), private and corporate contributions ($122.7 million annually) and other sources.
In addition to activities directly related to doing and promoting abortions, Planned Parenthood acts as one of the most powerful lobbying organizations in favor of abortion on demand. PPFA's annual report from 1993-94 reported on eight pending lawsuits against state regulations of abortion, including four cases in which PPFA was petitioning the courts to be given public funds that democratically elected state legislatures had refused to administer to them.
In Pennsylvania, Planned Parenthood seemed to have a real problem with parents, as they sued the state, holding up legislation allowing parental involvement in minors' abortion decisions for five years in the courts, at great cost to taxpayers....
(Source - PA Pro-Life Federation) Contact us at: admin@lifecorner.org
* * *
Get the Facts on Planned Parenthood
by Brian Clowes, PhD
Human Life International has long been at the forefront of the battle against the Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA), by exposing its true anti-life agenda throughout the world.
Most of our readers know that PPFA is a pro-abortion group and that it commits surgical abortions on a large scale. But not all yet realize the insidious nature of PPFA and its horrific impact on society as the behemoth of the abortion industry.
In the United States, about 20,000 staff and volunteers operate 142 Planned Parenthood affiliates and their 900 clinics, 130 of which commit surgical abortions.
In 1996, PPFA recorded an income of over half a billion dollars, one-third of which was taken out of taxpayers’ pockets.
In the same year, the organization committed 153,367 surgical abortions and referred 54,207 more; administered nearly a million pregnancy tests; had nearly two million birth control customers; filed suit against dozens of pro-life laws; and pushed explicit sex education programs all over the country....
These numbers give some idea of the colossal impact that Planned Parenthood has on millions of people every year, and tragically our youth....
PPFAs Involvement in Surgical and Chemical Abortion
In 1984, Faye Wattleton, then-President of PPFA, said "We know that the abortion issue is our issue." Abortion has always been Planned Parenthood’s number one issue.
On 1 July 1970, the state of New York legalized abortion. PPFA was so eager to begin exterminating preborn lives that it committed its first abortion the very next day. It now owns the biggest chain of abortion factories in the country and has committed nearly two and a half million abortions in the last 28 years——a number equivalent to the populations of St. Louis, San Diego, Phoenix, Pittsburgh or Baltimore.
Ever anxious to exploit new ways of exterminating the preborn, PPFA now pushes so-called "post-coital contraception" in a big way. The group recommends "doubling up" on birth control pills in order to enhance their abortifacient effect to end the life of an early developing human being. In 1996, PPFA gave this abortifacient to nearly 30,000 women, and will administer it to 50,000 more this year.
It is also beginning to administer methotrexate/misoprostol ("MTX") chemical abortions, and has declared its intention to distribute