Vultures in the...
VANGUARD
Sightings from The Catbird Seat
~ o ~
December 31, 2002
Bousa to manage Vanguard's
Wellington Fund
Vanguard Group's Wellington Fund debuted when the U.S. stock market's last four-year losing streak started . Edward P. Bousa will debut as the $22.3 billion fund's manager amid the threat of a repeat performance.
Bousa will take over Wellington, a fund that invests in stocks and bonds, when manager Ernst von Metzsch retires Tuesday. This year, the fund has its biggest annual decline in a quarter century as the Standard & Poor's 500 Index and the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell for a third straight year. Through Dec. 27, Wellington lost 7.5 percent.
"We did well under the circumstances," said Bousa, 44, who joined Boston-based Wellington Management Co. in April 2000 and has worked with the 63-year-old von Metzsch to oversee the fund since then.
"It's not reasonable, running the large amounts of money that we are, that we could be that different from the market in this kind of environment," Bousa said.
Wellington Fund was the first "balanced fund" and was started in 1929, the year of the so-called Black Tuesday crash. The S&P 500 and the Dow industrials dropped that year and kept falling through 1932.
These days, the fund invests between 60 percent and 70 percent of assets in shares of companies valued at more than $5 billion. Most of the stocks pay dividends. The rest of the assets are allocated to government and investment-grade corporate bonds with one- to 30-year maturities.
Vanguard, the second-biggest U.S. mutual-fund company, took over the fund from Wellington Management in 1975 and retained the firm as investment adviser. Wellington Management currently runs 11 of the Valley Forge, Pa.-based company's 112 funds and advises on portions of four others.
Bousa, who worked as a summer intern at Fidelity Investments in 1983, earned an MBA degree from Harvard University, Bousa went to Putnam Investments, Marsh & McLennan Cos.' Boston-based fund business. Bousa managed the Putnam Equity Income Fund from April 1993 through April 2000. The fund's per-share value doubled during the period while the S&P 500 index more than tripled.
Von Metzsch replaced Vincent Bajakian, who was Wellington's manager from 1972 until he died in a plane crash in 1995. During von Metzsch's tenure, Wellington had an average annual return of 9.2 percent, according to Vanguard. This year, the fund has done better than 96 percent of U.S. funds with similar investment styles, according to Bloomberg data. Wellington currently has 66 percent of the fund's assets invested in 111 stocks, Bousa said.
Bousa takes almost the same approach with the Hartford Dividend & Growth Fund, managed for Hartford Financial Services Group. The $1.1 billion fund is down 15 percent this year, when the S&P 500 has dropped 23 percent. Hartford Dividend's top three holdings on Sept. 30 were Exxon Mobil Corp., the world's biggest publicly traded oil company; DuPont Co., the second-largest U.S. chemicals maker; and Citigroup Inc., the world's largest financial-services company.
Bousa plans to follow the example of his predecessors. In the past 30 years, Wellington Fund's style and approach hasn't changed. It won't now, he said.
"I'm carrying on this firm's strong research-oriented approach," he said. "I suspect most of the decisions I make would be the ones my predecessors would have made."
January 25, 2008
Activists call on Vanguard Group
to divest $200M
Out of Africa
Philadelphia Business Journal - by Jeff Blumenthal Staff Writer
Jim Remsen, executive director of the Darfur Alert Coalition, believes investments in Sudan are funding genocide. (View)
While state and city governments are considering reducing their investments in companies that do business with the government of Sudan, the investment management industry has largely rejected activist calls for divestment.
Locally, Malvern-based Vanguard Group, which has roughly $200 million invested in a Chinese company known to do business with Sudan, said it is frequently asked by clients to divest from stocks for a variety of reasons -- from environmental and social issues to humanitarian and political concerns -- but it has declined, citing fiduciary duty.
"We think we should manage the funds to produce the best returns for the investors," Vanguard spokeswoman Rebecca Cohen said. "We do offer a social index fund, but beyond that we are not required to make a decision on social or political concerns."
Twenty-two states have adopted legislation to divest their public pensions, and Pennsylvania's legislature is considering a couple of bills (see story on page 30). At the end of last year President Bush signed into law the Sudan Accountability and Divestment Act, which protects states and investment firms from being sued by investors if they divest from companies with connections to the government of Sudan and also prohibits federal contracts with such companies.
Three of Vanguard's funds have investments in PetroChina, an oil company owned largely by the Chinese government which has been targeted by activists as the largest of four international oil companies doing business with the Sudanese government. The others are Sinopec of China, ONGC of India and Petronas of Malaysia.
Activists allege that the majority of oil revenue gained from these companies is used to fund the Sudanese government and militia's actions against non-Arab ethic groups in the Darfur region of the country, where it is estimated that as many as 400,000 people, mostly civilians, have been killed and roughly 2.5 million have fled to neighboring Chad.
Other local mutual fund companies touched by the issue are Oaks-based SEI Investments, which serves as the distributor for the iShares fund run by Barclays [Committee of 300], and Great Britain-based Aberdeen Asset Management, which has its U.S. headquarters in Center City. Both iShares and Aberdeen have significant investments in PetroChina. Several colleges, including the University of Pennsylvania, have divested.
Mutual fund companies are being targeted by divestment activists because they hold the retirement savings for millions of Americans. One of those people was Eric Cohen, who had his savings at Boston-based Fidelity Investments.
Now executive director of Investors Against Genocide in Lexington, Mass., he began to push the Massachusetts state government to divest from companies with Darfur connections in September 2006. He noticed Fidelity was the largest holder of PetroChina stock on the New York Stock Exchange.
"It raised the question of what happens with that money," he said. "It turns out that my family savings were invested in genocide."
Eric Cohen looked more broadly at the investment management industry and found that all of the major mutual fund companies were invested in PetroChina. He began engaging the companies, but found the industry's response disappointing.
"They have basically said it's their job to make money and not break laws and as long as they do that, they are not changing their position," he said.
Vanguard manages nearly $1.3 trillion in U.S. mutual fund assets, including more than $350 billion in retirement plans sponsored by employers.
When it came to dealing with Vanguard, Cohen allied with Jim Remsen, executive director of the Darfur Alert Coalition, a local group that raises attention about the Darfur crisis and organizes speaking engagements on the topic.
Eric Cohen and Remsen, the former religion editor of the Philadelphia Inquirer, spoke with Vanguard officials over the phone in October to urge them to eliminate PetroChina from their energy, international value and emerging market funds.
Remsen said Vanguard officials told them that if fund managers changed investments because of one social concern, they would have to do so every time. They also said that because two of the funds in question are index funds, they do not have the flexibility to change the investment.
"They're not budging on it," Remsen said. "They see it as part of their fiduciary duty, and that it's a slippery slope. If they divest there, they think they would have to do it elsewhere. I said that Sudan could be a risky investment if those oil fields are attacked. Then I think they realized what kind of campaign we are running and they didn't think anything constructive could come out of further dialogue."
Vanguard said it is sensitive to the social and humanitarian crisis unfolding in Darfur. As a global investor with ownership stakes in several firms with business interests in this region, Vanguard said in a statement that it has engaged and sought to influence those companies, "encouraging them to take part in constructive and positive change in Sudan in a way that improves the health and welfare of the Sudanese people."
Rather than divest, Vanguard has elected to exert influence on companies with possible ties to Sudan's oil resources through engagement. But Remsen and others wonder what engagement entails.
"We take the engagement seriously," Vanguard's Rebecca Cohen said. "We are long-term investors so the companies also take our investments seriously. We have sent letters asking them to understand our position about Darfur and want them to work for change in the Darfur region."
Activists internally debate the merits of divestment versus engagement. Eric Cohen said many would support vigorous engagement, which he defines as publicized efforts that are supported by management, include a timetable for results and consequences for lack of progress, and are tied to trading policy, meaning the funds will stop acquiring stock if nothing is accomplished.
Some large investors have already steered clear of companies doing business with Sudan. Warren Buffett trimmed Berkshire Hathaway's holdings in PetroChina and Allianz of Newport Beach, Calif., sold all of its $750 million investment. One fund manager at Fidelity sold half of $1.3 billion in PetroChina stock.
"[Vanguard and others] make it sound like they have no flexibility and fiduciary duty requires them to do it," Eric Cohen said. "But not all funds are making the same decision. I think their customers would prefer genocide-free investing."
Vanguard officials said they have not received many calls from clients about their connections to Darfur or wishing to move their investments to the social index fund -- which consists of investments based on social and humanitarian concerns -- or leave Vanguard all together.
"It really has been a handful proportionally," Rebecca Cohen said. "Especially when you consider how many investors we have."
February 23, 2008
Cut-off Cancer Patient
to Receive $9 Million
By THOMAS WATKINS, Associated Press Writer
LOS ANGELES - A woman who had her medical coverage canceled as she was undergoing treatment for breast cancer has been awarded more than $9 million in a case against one of California's largest health insurers.
Patsy Bates, 52, a hairdresser from Lakewood, had been left with more than $129,000 in unpaid medical bills when Health Net Inc. canceled her policy in 2004.
On Friday, arbitration judge Sam Cianchetti ordered Health Net to repay that amount while providing $8.4 million in punitive damages and $750,000 for emotional distress.
"It's hard to imagine a situation more trying than the one Bates has had to endure," Cianchetti wrote in the decision. "The rug was pulled out from underneath, and that occurred at a time when she is diagnosed with breast cancer, one of the leading causes of death for women."
Bates, a mother of two, said she screamed when she heard about the damage award.
"I am elated," she said.
Bates' attorney William Shernoff said he wanted other insurers to take notice of the award.
"We are going to put a stop to this practice," he said.
Health Net said it was implementing a freeze on policy cancelations that would last until the company sets up a third-party review panel to scrutinize cases.
"Obviously we regret the way that this has turned out, but we are intent on fixing the processes to maintain the public trust," spokesman David Olson said.
The award came a day after the Los Angeles city attorney sued Health Net, claiming it illegally canceled the coverage of about 1,600 patients. City Attorney Rocky Delgadillo also said the company illegally ran an incentive program in which it paid bonuses to an administrator for meeting targets of policy cancelations.
Health Net acknowledged that such a program existed in 2002 and 2003 but was subsequently scrapped.
"It's hard to imagine a policy more reprehensible than tying bonuses to encourage the recision of health insurance that helps keep the public well and alive," Cianchetti wrote in the Bates decision.
Bates had been insured with another company but was persuaded to switch over to a Health Net policy after an agent suggested she could save money.
She said she had undergone surgery to remove a tumor and had received her first two chemotherapy treatments when doctors stopped treating her because her bills were going unpaid.
"I was devastated. I didn't know what was going to happen," Bates said. "It's boggling that someone can do that to you."
Bates went on to complete her cancer treatment through a state-funded program.
Health Net also said it would review its practices and the way its brokers and agents are trained.
February 21, 2008
City Attorney Files Lawsuit
Against Health Net Inc.
LOS ANGELES -- Health Net Inc., a Woodland Hills-based insurance company, engaged in a secret and illegal scheme to drop patients if they needed expensive medical treatment, according to a lawsuit announced Thursday by the Los Angeles city attorney.
A representative for Health Net denied the accusations, saying the insurance company properly investigates claims that might not be appropriate in order to ensure fairness for the company's 135,000 California policyholders.
The lawsuit, filed Wednesday in Los Angeles Superior Court, accuses Health Net of "unlawful, unfair and fraudulent acts" by designing a confusing and ambiguous application to maximize the possibility that policyholders will make errors or omissions the insurance company can later use to rescind coverage.
In the last four years, benefits were denied to 1,600 Health Net customers in serious or critical need of health care, said City Attorney Rocky Delgadillo.
"This is an industry with a history of putting profits before people," Delgadillo said. "Their practices are not only illegal, they are immoral and we are going to hold them accountable."
In addition to the civil complaint, which names two Health Net subsidiaries, Delgadillo's office is pursing a criminal investigation against individual employees who received bonuses based in part on canceling policies of people who have submitted substantial medical claims.
Delgadillo said those employees may have violated the state's Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plant Act, which regulates managed care plans.
A spokesman for Health Net denied the city's allegations.
The lawsuit "is not going to achieve anything in terms of increasing access to low-cost coverage for thousands of Californians, which is what we're in the business of doing," said Health Net spokesman David Olson.
In 2007, Health Net insured 135,000 Californians and paid $200 million in medical claims, Olson said.
"We work hard to approve applications, we work hard to investigate where we think there may be issues and we rescind only after a thorough process," Olson said. "(The) process is very open. We communicate to members frequently, and they have rights of appeal."
The city is asking the court to fine Health Net $2,500 for each violation of the Unfair Competition Law and False Advertising Law, and another $2,500 for each Unfair Competition violation related to a senior citizen or disabled person.
http://www.knbc.com/health/15366673/detail.html?rss=la&psp=news
Health Net Lawsuit Reveals
Bonuses Were Paid to Cancel Policies
Documents that were produced at an arbitration hearing on November 8th reveal a company-wide practice of pulling policies once a major medical claim is made and then looking back at the claimant’s original health insurance application for even minor flaws in order to justify cancellation of the policy.
In a lawsuit against Health Net, one of California’s largest health insurers, it was also revealed that bonuses were paid in part for how many policies were cancelled and how much money was saved as a result.
An Industry-Wide Practice
These revelations come at a time when major health insurers, such as Blue Cross, Blue Shield, and Kaiser Permanente, are coming under increased scrutiny in California for canceling policies once expensive treatments are authorized. Policies are often scrutinized for even minor flaws in the original application for health insurance. If a flaw is found, the policy can be canceled, leaving the policyholder with overwhelming medical bills and no coverage.
Lawsuits Over Canceled Policies
These practices are being challenged in courts by policyholders throughout California. Lawmakers and regulators are looking very closely at whether or not insurers have broken the law, both by canceling policies where the application did not show a clear intent to defraud the insurer, and by tying compensation (i.e. bonuses) of claims reviewers to their claims decisions.
Health Net was sued by Patsy Bates of Gardena, California when the insurer canceled her policy in the middle of her chemotherapy treatments for breast cancer. Ms. Bates is seeking $6 million in damages in her Health Net lawsuit.
Health Net Tried to Keep the Information Secret
Health Net sought to keep the documents from going public, but the arbitrator in the case, Judge Sam Cianchetti, ruled that the proceedings would be open to reporters and that all documents produced for arbitration would be public, citing public interest as a reason for allowing the exposure of potentially very embarrassing information about HealthNet practices and procedures.
Health Net lawyers defended the company, claiming the company had not run afoul of state law because the employee for whom bonuses were paid was not a claims reviewer, but an underwriter. Time will tell if Health Net’s defense is convincing enough for Judge Cianchetti.
WHO OWNS HEALTH NET?
|
|||||||
Institution Name |
Shs Held |
Shs Chg |
%Chg |
$Chg* |
% |
% |
Rpt Date |
Wellington Management Company, LLP |
10,368,532 |
-387,428 |
-3.6 |
-7,495,533 |
9.4 |
0.2 |
09-30-07 |
4,408,735 |
915,220 |
26.2 |
53,834,536 |
4.0 |
0.0 |
09-30-07 |
|
AIM Management Group, Inc. |
4,152,961 |
-378,531 |
-8.4 |
-14,795,236 |
3.8 |
0.4 |
09-30-07 |
Renaissance Technologies Corp. |
3,468,600 |
2,650,100 |
323.8 |
144,261,024 |
3.1 |
0.3 |
09-30-07 |
Snow Capital Management, L.P. |
3,289,766 |
-107,198 |
-3.2 |
-24,710,206 |
3.0 |
2.9 |
12-31-07 |
Vanguard Group, Inc. |
3,178,165 |
299,332 |
10.4 |
19,777,436 |
2.9 |
0.0 |
09-30-07 |
State Street Global Advisors (US) |
2,694,668 |
-68,088 |
-2.5 |
-226,712 |
2.4 |
0.0 |
09-30-07 |
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. |
2,083,280 |
-2,870,690 |
-57.9 |
-148,968,336 |
1.9 |
0.0 |
09-30-07 |
AXA Rosenberg Investment Management LLC |
1,690,270 |
38,117 |
2.3 |
4,125,416 |
1.5 |
0.2 |
09-30-07 |
OppenheimerFunds, Inc. |
1,583,661 |
43,336 |
2.8 |
4,267,717 |
1.4 |
0.1 |
09-30-07 |
Analytic Investors, LLC |
1,452,953 |
-273,306 |
-15.8 |
-12,614,365 |
1.3 |
0.8 |
09-30-07 |
Jacobs Levy Equity Management, Inc. |
1,422,900 |
-199,200 |
-12.3 |
-8,739,135 |
1.3 |
0.4 |
09-30-07 |
RiverSource Investments, LLC |
1,395,605 |
26,549 |
1.9 |
3,146,293 |
1.3 |
0.1 |
09-30-07 |
Calamos Advisors LLC |
1,360,384 |
-4,616 |
-0.3 |
1,456,755 |
1.2 |
0.3 |
09-30-07 |
Oppenheimer Capital L.L.C. |
1,169,242 |
-779,201 |
-40.0 |
-39,680,260 |
1.1 |
0.2 |
09-30-07 |
http://moneycentral.msn.com/ownership?Symbol=HNT
May 17, 2005
Prudential and Health Net
settle physician lawsuits
By: Catherine Sicker , Compliance Officer
Prudential Insurance of America and Health Net agreed in a settlement dated May 3, 2005 to pay more than 80 million dollars to settle a national class action lawsuit.
Under the settlement, which still must be approved by the U.S. District Court in Miami, Health Net will pay an $39 million to a settlement fund for payments to physicians, $20 million in legal fees, and $1 million to a fund to be used to ensure compliance with the settlement. They will also develop and implement plans to improve how they do business with physicians, including speeding up claims processing and creating an external board to resolve billing disputes.
Prudential, which sold its health care subsidiary to Aetna in 1999, agreed to pay $22.2 million....
http://www.quadax.com/News/Bulletins/20050517.htm
December 10, 2003
Kamehameha has
new CEO
The schools' new hire wins
praise for her leadership and
her background in health
By Craig Gima, Star-Bulletin
Kamehameha Schools' new chief executive officer was hired for her leadership and healing qualities as well as her understanding of the $6 billion dollar trust's mission, trustees said yesterday.
Dee Jay Mailer is a 1970 Kamehameha graduate and former CEO of Kaiser Permanente Hawaii who started her career as a nurse at Kapiolani and Kaiser Medical Centers. Her two daughters also graduated from Kamehameha.
"We have been through some difficult times," trustee J. Douglas Ing said. "We see Dee Jay as bringing stability to our organization."
Ing said he hopes Mailer's hiring will bring "closure to years of controversy and crisis."
Just last week the school settled a lawsuit and allowed a non-Hawaiian seventh-grader to continue to attend Kamehameha. Another lawsuit challenging the schools native Hawaiian preference admissions policy is likely to be appealed to the 9th Circuit.
In May, former CEO Hamilton McCubbin resigned after the school conducted two investigations into allegations that McCubbin had an inappropriate relationship with a female staffer. McCubbin has denied the allegations.
McCubbin's appointment in January 2000 as the school's first CEO was hailed as a major milestone in the controversy surrounding the removal of former Bishop Estate trustees Henry Peters, Richard "Dickie" Wong, Lokelani Lindsey, Oswald Stender and Gerard Jervis.
Mailer was not at the press conference yesterday. She is finishing work at her current job as chief operating officer of The Global Fund, a public-private multibillion-dollar trust based in Geneva, Switzerland, that raises and distributes money to fight AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria.
She starts at Kamehameha Schools on Jan. 19.
The Kamehameha Schools is the state's largest private landowner and one of the nation's wealthiest charities. The will of Princess Bernice Pauahi Bishop created the nonprofit trust in 1884. Kamehameha and its programs spent more than $222 million last year to provide educational services to about 16,000 children, mostly of native Hawaiian ancestry.
In a written statement, Mailer cited a desire to give back to Hawaii as a reason for taking the CEO position.
"It's been a dream for me to find a fitting way to return home to my Kamehameha family," Mailer said.
"Pauahi was loving and wise," she said. "And we must now protect her gift and focus on educating Hawaiian children. And once Hawaiian children receive this gift, they must -- and will -- repay it by helping others.
"So, as keiki o ka aina, I am excited to have found my way back to repay the gift given to me."
Ing said Mailer is committed to the Kamehameha's strategic plan to provide more outreach and education to native Hawaiian children.
Trustee Nainoa Thompson said Mailer understands the mission of the schools to provide for Hawaiians living in poverty, "to meet the needs of those that we serve the least."
Mailer received her nursing degree at the University of Hawaii at Manoa in 1975 and went back to UH to get a master of business administration in 1985. She worked in hospital management at Kaiser Hawaii from 1986 through 1999 and was named CEO in 1995.
She left to become chief administrative officer for Health Net, a California network model health plan serving 2.3 million members.
Ing said Mailer's health background may help with pre-natal education initiatives that have been discussed by the trustees. He said she also may be able to get hospitals involved in giving Kamehameha's students opportunities in health care.
Mailer's salary is not being released. Trustee Chairwoman Constance Lau said Mailer does not have an employment contract. McCubbin earned more than $350,000 a year.
Colleen Wong, who had been acting CEO, will return to her position as Kamehameha's vice-president for legal affairs.
Lau said Mailer emerged as the top candidate after 11 hours of interviews with the trustees.
"Dee Jay is a leader who can lift people up to perform at a level they never realized themselves," said trustee Robert Kihune. "She was a person that could lead the charge and not be the person standing behind with a stick, moving people by beating them up to get them to move forward."
The selection process took seven months and began with nominations from Kamehameha alumni, parents, teachers and community members. Mailer was nominated by both the search firm and alumni, Lau said.
http://starbulletin.com/2003/12/10/news/story1.html
# # #
FOR MORE SICK BIRDS
GO TO
\/
BEHIND THE BLINDS AT FIDELITY INVESTMENTS
CONFESSIONS OF A WHISTLEBLOWER
DIRTY MONEY, DIRTY POLITICS & BISHOP ESTATE
MARSH & McLENNAN: THE MARSH BIRDS
NESTS OF THE INSURANCE VAMPIRES
OFFICE OF THE U.S. TRUSTEE vs. HARMON
PACIFIC GROUP MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
PIMPS TO POWER: THE K-STREET WALKERS
PRUDENTIAL: A NEST ON SHAKY GROUND
THE SILENCE OF THE WHISTLE BLOWERS
VULTURES CAUGHT IN THE HEALTH NET
# # #
FAIR USE NOTICE. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml . If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
# # #
Last Update February 25, 2008, by The Catbird